Hellobox V5 firmware release 20191109A

Peugeot 207
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 12:50 pm

Re: Hellobox V5 firmware release 20191109A

Post by Peugeot 207 » Mon Dec 16, 2019 10:26 am

gxu wrote:
Mon Dec 16, 2019 1:46 am
Peugeot 207 wrote:
Sun Dec 15, 2019 9:06 pm
gxu wrote:
Sat Nov 09, 2019 9:23 am
Release notes:
  • support t2mi
  • add scam qrcode active in Network->Scam+
  • fix some bugs
1. backup of your channel/setting information, this version may lost your data.
2. Due to the scam server upgrade, you must use this new software to active the scam!
The old scam active will not work soon. It does not affect the scam that already actived.
Just now flashed my V5 with this firmware.

My question is:
You claimed : T2MI support
4.8E has one TP with T2MI frequency. ( 12188 H 30000 5/6 )
Have strong signal on 4.8E and this frequency , but nothing scanned.
Am I doing something wrong,?
This TP is multistream + T2mi. Multistream is not supported with this chipset, you may try Hellobox 8.
Sorry Sir, think you wrong. This TP ( 12188 H ) is T2MI only.
The other one ( 12341 H ) is a mix of simple Multistream ( without PLS , or ROOT , or COMBO ) and T2MI channels, and also not visible by the V5, because as you said and I agree: this chipset doesn't support Multistream in any mode.
Don't understand, how could the V5 would be able to support T2MI if there will be a TP with T2MI channels only ?
T2MI is also a Multistream mode, with PID's encpsulated in stream itself.
Don't want to try the V8 only for this. Had plenty of reciever's there are capable to lock Multistream channels in any mode.
Was asking about V5, only because red about this feature in this last firmware update
Appreciate for another reply.
Best regards

Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2019 5:14 pm

Re: Hellobox V5 firmware release 20191109A

Post by mraskar3 » Mon Dec 16, 2019 2:27 pm

Lots for bugs in Cccam, mgccam.and no access to 88e and 108e third class scam+ best is forever server. don't buy any of gtmedia products.All products are buggy and not reliable.

Post Reply